When Can the IFR Suspend or Revoke a Club's Licence?

Suspension or revocation of an operating licence is the IFR's most serious club sanction. The IFR's final guidance describes it as a very last resort, but the Football Governance Act 2025 does not create one mandatory ladder that every case must climb. Schedule 9 permits suspension or revocation after a relevant infringement when one of three additional conditions is met; one of those conditions does not require a history of persistent breaches. A separate section 19 route can revoke a provisional licence where the club persistently fails to take reasonable steps to meet the full licence test and there is no reasonable prospect of doing so in time. The Act's sanctions do not include points deductions or transfer bans. This article explains the routes and their safeguards.

Lagom Article Header CTA

This article is brought to you by Lagom Sports Compliance -- the leading governance, risk, compliance and anti-financial crime consultancy built exclusively for professional football. We help clubs, agents and leagues navigate the IFR, UEFA licensing and EU AML obligations with proportionate, practitioner-led support.

Want to talk through what this means for your club?

Get in touch → Email us →

The starting point: cooperation and proportionality, not a compulsory ladder

The IFR says it will not be enforcement-led and its final Information Gathering and Enforcement Guidance commits it to proportionate, transparent and constructive engagement. Early supervisory contact is therefore not, by itself, evidence that a club is heading towards licence loss. A section 65 information notice may be used for any IFR function and does not necessarily indicate suspected non-compliance. Formal investigation begins only where the IFR has reasonable grounds to suspect a relevant infringement. Even then, the Act and guidance allow different outcomes -- including closure or, for eligible infringements, an accepted commitment -- rather than an automatic progression through every sanction.

Licence Loss Last Resort Callout

⚠

Licence loss is intended to be a last resort, but the legal threshold is route-specific: a long history of failed sanctions is not required in every case.

The Part 8 enforcement route, step by step

Step one: information gathering and, if warranted, investigation. The IFR may use informal requests, issue a section 65 information notice or appoint an expert reporter where the statutory necessity test is met. Those powers are not dependent on an investigation. A formal section 68 investigation requires reasonable grounds to suspect a relevant infringement. Once opened, the IFR may require individuals to answer questions and may seek a warrant to enter business premises and obtain relevant information.
Step two: commitment, closure or warning notice. For eligible infringements, the IFR may accept an appropriate commitment offered during an investigation and close the covered part of the case. It may also issue a closure notice if no infringement is found. If the IFR is minded to take enforcement action, section 76 requires a warning notice describing the proposed action and reasons and allowing at least 14 days for representations. That is a minimum response period after the warning notice -- not a statutory first-14-days phase of an investigation.
Step three: the decision notice. After the representations period, the IFR must decide as soon as reasonably practicable whether to take action and issue a decision notice explaining its decision, who made it, any required steps and the available review or appeal rights. A suspension or revocation cannot appear for the first time at this stage: it must have been specified in the warning notice.
Step four: sanctions short of licence loss. For a relevant infringement, the toolkit includes a public censure, a financial penalty, requiring a club to appoint an IFR-nominated skilled person, and -- for specified continuing infringements -- an application to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for an injunction. The maximum fixed penalty for a regulated club, its owner or a competition organiser is 10% of the relevant club's or organiser's total revenue. That is a statutory ceiling, not an expected or standard outcome.
Step five: Schedule 9 suspension or revocation. The IFR must determine that the club, without reasonable excuse, committed a relevant infringement and that at least one aggravating condition applies. The conditions are: (1) the infringement is intentional and persistent, earlier Schedule 9 action has been taken, and no further action short of licence loss would end it; (2) the club has intentionally and persistently failed to cooperate with the investigation, earlier action has been taken, and no further lesser action would end the infringement; or (3) the infringement jeopardises the IFR's ability to advance one or more objectives. The third condition does not itself require persistence or prior sanctions, although the IFR's published policy still describes licence loss as a very last resort.

A second route, and who makes licence-loss decisions

Section 19 is separate from Schedule 9 and applies only to a provisional licence. The IFR may revoke where the full licence test is not met, the club has persistently and without reasonable excuse failed to take reasonable steps for the test to be met, and there is no reasonable prospect of meeting it within a reasonable period even with more time. The section 18 process includes notice, reasons and at least 14 days for representations. Section 19 does not create a power to suspend a provisional licence. For both section 19 revocation and Schedule 9 licence action, the Board may make the decision or delegate it only to a committee of the Board -- not to the Expert Panel. If the decision is notified during a football season, it cannot take effect before that season ends. A concerned person may seek an internal review by the Board or a Board committee; for these licence decisions, a person with sufficient interest may instead appeal directly to the Competition Appeal Tribunal on the merits.

Why No Points Deduction Transfer Ban Box

Why the IFR cannot deduct points or impose a transfer ban

The enacted Act\'s direct civil-sanctions toolkit is specific: censure, financial penalties, a skilled-person requirement for clubs, injunctive relief for specified continuing infringements, and suspension or revocation of an operating licence where the additional conditions are met. It does not confer a points-deduction or transfer-ban power.

Competition organisers and governing bodies operate separate sporting rulebooks, so related conduct may still produce sporting consequences through a different process. The boundary should not be overstated: an IFR licence suspension or revocation prevents the club from operating a team in the regulated competitions, although a decision notified during the season cannot take effect before that season ends.

How individual sanctions connect to the club's own escalation

Schedule 7 provides a direct but carefully defined link. A senior manager commits a relevant infringement where the club, without reasonable excuse, commits one and that infringement is connected to a senior management function carried out by that manager. A senior manager also commits an infringement by failing to comply with an accepted section 70 commitment. The IFR may censure or fine the individual separately. For an officer or senior manager who is not also an owner, the maximum fixed penalty is the higher of 10% of relevant remuneration and £75,000; this is a maximum, not an automatic penalty.

A suitability reassessment is a separate ODSE process, not an automatic next step after a sanction. Under section 35, the IFR may assess whether an incumbent officer meets the officer fitness criteria only where it has information giving grounds for concern. Serious or persistent non-compliance may be relevant evidence, but the IFR must make the statutory fitness determination and follow the applicable notice, representation, review and appeal safeguards before any resulting direction or disqualification consequence.

Urgent directions: the exception to the ordinary notice sequence

Section 79 allows the IFR to give an urgent direction where it determines that a person, without reasonable excuse, has committed a relevant infringement, the infringement is continuing, and it jeopardises or immediately risks jeopardising the IFR's ability to advance one or more objectives. The direction may require or prohibit action and may last indefinitely. It does not depend on the ordinary section 76 warning-notice sequence, although the IFR must give reasons and, if no opportunity for representations was provided, explain why. Failure to comply is itself a relevant infringement: the IFR may impose available sanctions and may apply to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for an injunction to bring the continuing infringement to an end.

For the detail of the IFR's information-gathering and investigation powers, see Lagom's guides to sections 65 and 66. For personal fines, fitness determinations and disqualification, see Lagom's guide to ODSE enforcement. For the procedural choices after a licence decision, see Lagom's guide to internal review and Competition Appeal Tribunal appeals.

Licence loss is intended to be a last resort, but it is not governed by one universal escalation ladder. Protecting the club starts with identifying the correct statutory route, threshold and deadline.

Lagom Sports Compliance is the leading specialist governance, risk, compliance and anti-financial crime consultancy built exclusively for professional football, globally. We support clubs through IFR licensing and enforcement -- identifying which statutory route applies, managing information and warning notices, preparing representations, and resolving concerns before licence action becomes necessary. If your club has received supervisory contact, an investigation notice, a warning notice or an urgent direction, get in touch.

For licensing, we offer:

Review Only support for clubs preparing their own application who want an independent, criterion-by-criterion review before submission;
Part Support for clubs that want to lead certain work-streams while we own others; and
Full Support, where a named senior consultant leads the entire licensing project from readiness assessment through to post-submission.

For ODSE specifically, we help CEOs and their leadership teams map exactly who in the organisation is in scope, assess individual readiness against the fitness and source of wealth tests, and build the material change notification process that keeps you compliant for as long as you hold the role, not just at the point of your original determination. If any of the concerns above sound genuinely familiar, get in touch and we will talk through what the right level of support looks like for your specific position.

We have also built a self service IFR readiness assessment tool. It takes around 15 minutes to complete and gives you a guide as to what you may need to, based on what you already have in place.