Fan engagement under IFR licensing: what English football clubs must do now and why getting it right matters
For most of English football's history, how a club engaged with its supporters was a matter of choice. The Football Governance Act 2025 has ended that. Fan engagement is now a mandatory condition of the IFR operating licence every regulated club must hold. This article explains what the requirement demands, what it does not demand, and why the clubs that treat it as a governance opportunity rather than a compliance burden will emerge from the licensing process in the stronger commercial and reputational position.
From voluntary to mandatory: the statutory context
The Football Governance Act 2025, which received Royal Assent on 21 July 2025, established the Independent Football Regulator and a statutory licensing framework covering all 116 clubs in the top five tiers of English men's professional football. Schedule 5 of the Act, read with section 20, sets out four conditions that the IFR must attach to every operating licence: a financial plans condition, a corporate governance statement condition, a fan consultation condition, and an annual declaration condition.
The fan consultation condition is the fourth of those mandatory conditions. It requires every regulated club to carry out regular consultation on relevant matters with elected fan representatives or persons the IFR considers representative of the club's supporter base. The IFR has discretion over the specific form and frequency of consultation, calibrated to the size of the club's fanbase and its available resources. What is not discretionary is the obligation to have a structured process at all.
Every regulated club must hold at least a provisional operating licence to compete from the 2027/28 season. The full application window opened in November 2026. The fan consultation condition attaches from the moment a licence comes into force -- a provisional licence is not a period of reduced obligation. Clubs that have not established a compliant engagement structure before they apply will have to build one as a condition of maintaining their licence.
For a full overview of the Football Governance Act 2025 and the IFR's powers, see Lagom Sports Compliance's compliance overview for English clubs.
What the fan consultation condition actually requires
The language of the Act is deliberately precise in ways that distinguish this obligation from what most clubs currently do. The requirement is not for a communications programme. It is not for a matchday survey, a social media strategy or a fan satisfaction questionnaire. It is for structured consultation: a process through which the club actively seeks input from representative fan bodies on relevant matters, documents how that input was considered, and can demonstrate how engagement outcomes were accounted for in decision-making.
The distinction between communication and consultation is the central test. Communication is the club broadcasting information to fans. Consultation is the club seeking input from fans and responding to it. A club that sends weekly email newsletters, maintains an active social media presence and runs a fan experience team has a strong communications function. Whether it has a consultation function depends entirely on whether fans are being asked questions, whether their answers are being recorded, and whether those answers demonstrably influence decisions.
The Act does not exhaustively define what constitutes a 'relevant matter' for consultation purposes. The IFR's guidance and the corporate governance code it is developing will shape this in practice. Based on the Act's own stated purpose -- protecting and promoting the heritage of English football and the financial soundness of clubs -- the following categories are almost certainly in scope: significant changes to ticket pricing structures; changes to ground infrastructure or stadium capacity; changes to club identity elements such as badge, kit or name; commercial partnerships with material fan impact; changes to membership or season ticket structures; and any proposal that would materially alter the matchday experience.
The fan consultation condition does not operate in isolation. The corporate governance statement condition -- also mandatory under Schedule 5 -- requires the club to explain publicly how it is applying the IFR's governance code. Fan engagement evidence will form part of that public record. The IFR will publish every club's latest governance statement and produce an annual governance report assessing how well the sector is applying the code. A club's fan engagement record will therefore be publicly visible and comparatively assessed against other regulated clubs. This is not a private regulatory matter.
Building a compliant fan engagement structure
The IFR does not prescribe a single model for fan consultation. It requires evidence of a genuine process. For most clubs, that means establishing or formalising three interconnected elements -- and doing so before the licensing application is submitted rather than as a remediation exercise afterwards.
The first is a representative structure. The IFR will want to see that the people being consulted are genuinely representative of the fanbase. This means independently constituted rather than club-appointed, covering a breadth of supporter demographics rather than only season-ticket holders, and capable of providing genuine rather than performative input. Many clubs already have relationships with supporter trusts or independent supporter advisory boards. The question is whether those structures are formally recognised, their membership processes are transparent, and their remit covers the matters on which the club is required to consult.
The second is a documented process. Every consultation meeting, every agenda item, every submission of fan views and every record of how that input was considered needs to be in writing. This is governance infrastructure, not administrative paperwork. The club's annual declaration to the IFR will need to certify that consultation obligations have been met during the preceding twelve months. That certification is only defensible if the documentation exists. Clubs should establish a dedicated consultation log from the moment their engagement structure is operational.
The third is a visible closed loop on outcomes. Consultation that has no demonstrable effect on decisions is not meaningful consultation. Where fan input changes a decision, that should be communicated clearly to the representative body. Where fan input is noted but a different decision is taken, the reasons should be documented and shared. A club that can demonstrate a consistent pattern of consulting, recording, considering and responding will satisfy the IFR's expectations. A club that consults and then makes decisions with no visible reference to the process will not.
Clubs that treat the fan consultation condition as a compliance exercise will find it expensive and adversarial. Clubs that treat it as a governance mechanism will find it builds the trust that underpins commercial value.
The governance code: what the IFR expects clubs to demonstrate
The IFR is developing a governance code against which all regulated clubs will be assessed. While the final code was not published at the time of writing, the IFR's own consultation documents and the Act's stated objectives make clear the direction of travel on fan engagement specifically.
The IFR has indicated it will assess not just whether a club has a consultation structure but whether that structure functions as intended. Evidence of how fan views have been acted upon -- or, where they have not been acted upon, how the club communicated the reasons -- will be more significant than the formal existence of a fan advisory board. This is consistent with the broader regulatory shift, visible across multiple frameworks, from procedural compliance towards demonstrable outcomes. A club with a fan advisory board that has not met for six months is in a weaker position than a club with a less formal but actively used consultation mechanism.
The annual governance report the IFR is required to produce will compare fan engagement practice across all regulated clubs. Clubs in the lower tiers should not assume this assessment will be lenient. The Act's proportionality provisions relate to the form of consultation -- acknowledging that a National League club with limited resources cannot maintain the same infrastructure as a Premier League club -- but not to the substance of the obligation. Every regulated club must have a genuine, operational consultation process.
The commercial case: why this is also an opportunity
There is a commercial dimension to this obligation that the licensing framework itself does not address but that any club executive should consider. Fan engagement is not only a regulatory requirement under the Football Governance Act 2025. It is the foundation of the commercial relationships that generate revenue.
Sponsors pay a premium to be associated with clubs whose supporter relationships are strong and whose fan base is engaged, loyal and vocal. Kit partners, naming rights purchasers and digital media partners all price fan loyalty into their commercial propositions. A club that can demonstrate -- through its IFR governance statement, through published fan engagement records, through publicly visible consultation outcomes -- that it maintains a genuine and structured relationship with its supporters is a more attractive commercial partner than one that cannot.
The FCA's warning to Premier League clubs in June 2026 about sponsorship deals with unauthorised financial firms was framed, in part, around fan trust: clubs that accept commercial partnerships from firms exploiting the legitimacy of the club's badge are harming the supporters who trust it. That framing is not accidental. The IFR, the FCA and the broader regulatory environment are all converging on the same underlying principle: a club's relationship with its fans is an asset with regulatory as well as commercial value. The fan consultation condition is a framework for building that asset systematically rather than leaving it to chance.
Where to start: the practical first steps
For clubs that do not yet have a formal fan engagement structure -- and the majority of clubs below the Premier League do not -- the logical sequence is as follows.
Audit current engagement activity. Map what currently exists: supporter trust relationships, any advisory board structures, consultation history, existing communication channels. Identify what is documented and what is not.
Establish or formalise a representative structure. If no independent fan body exists, engage with supporter trust networks and the broader fan base to establish one with transparent membership and a clear remit covering relevant licensing matters.
Define the consultation scope. Work through the categories of decision most likely to be classified as 'relevant matters' and document the club's approach to how and when fan input will be sought on each.
Build the documentation infrastructure. Establish a consultation log, a record of attendees and agenda items, a process for recording fan submissions and a system for tracking how input was considered and communicated back.
Test the process before the application. Do not wait for the IFR to assess the structure before establishing whether it works. A live consultation cycle run before the licensing application gives the club evidence of a functioning process and the opportunity to address any gaps.
For a full guide to IFR operating licence requirements across all six licensing criteria, see Lagom Sports Compliance's complete IFR licensing guide. For specific advisory support on IFR compliance, see lagomsportscompliance.com/ifr-compliance-for-english-football-clubs.
The application window is open. The clock is running.
Lagom Sports Compliance works with English football clubs on IFR operating licence applications across all six licensing criteria, including the fan consultation condition, corporate governance framework and ownership integrity requirements. The firm's approach is to help clubs build compliance structures that are genuinely operational rather than assembled for regulatory purposes -- the kind that satisfy the IFR and deliver lasting governance value.
Explore IFR-specific support at lagomsportscompliance.com/ifr-compliance-for-english-football-clubs.
Contact us today for a free private conversation.
Fan engagement is not what the IFR is asking you to do. It is what you should have been doing already.
Frequently asked questions: fan engagement and IFR licensing
-
Yes. Under Schedule 5, section 20 of the Football Governance Act 2025, the Independent Football Regulator is required to attach a fan consultation condition to every operating licence it issues to a regulated club. This means fan engagement is a mandatory licensing condition for all 116 clubs in the Premier League, Championship, League One, League Two and National League Step 1. A club cannot hold an IFR operating licence without demonstrating a structured fan consultation process. Without a licence, the club cannot compete in its specified competition from the 2027/28 season.
-
The fan consultation condition requires every regulated club to carry out regular, structured and documented consultation with elected fan representatives or persons the IFR considers representative of the club's supporter base. The IFR has discretion over the precise form and frequency, calibrated to the size of the club's fanbase and its resources. In practice, this means establishing an independently constituted representative fan body, developing a documented consultation process for relevant matters, recording how fan input is considered, and demonstrating through the club's corporate governance statement how engagement outcomes have been accounted for in decision-making.
-
Fan communication is the club broadcasting information to supporters, newsletters, social media, matchday announcements. Fan consultation is the club actively seeking input from representative fan bodies on relevant matters, recording that input and demonstrating how it influenced decision-making. The IFR's fan consultation condition requires the latter. A club with a strong communications function but no structured consultation process does not satisfy the licensing requirement. The test is whether fans are being asked questions, whether their answers are documented, and whether those answers demonstrably affect decisions.
-
The Act does not exhaustively define 'relevant matters' for consultation purposes. Based on the Act's stated objectives and the IFR's developing governance code, the following categories are likely to be in scope: significant changes to ticket pricing structures; changes to ground infrastructure or stadium capacity; changes to club identity elements such as badge, kit or name; commercial partnerships with material fan impact; changes to membership or season ticket structures; and any proposal that would materially alter the matchday experience. The IFR's guidance will develop the definition further. Clubs should err towards broader rather than narrower interpretation.
-
Yes. The fan consultation condition is a mandatory condition that attaches to every operating licence issued to any regulated club across all five tiers. The Act's proportionality provisions mean that the IFR will calibrate the form and frequency of consultation to the size of the club's fanbase and its available resources, a National League club is not expected to maintain the same infrastructure as a Premier League club. However, the substance of the obligation is the same: every regulated club must have a genuine, operational consultation process. Proportionality affects the form, not the requirement.
-
Every regulated club must hold at least a provisional operating licence to compete from the 2027/28 season. The full application window opened in November 2026 and closes in February 2027. The fan consultation condition attaches from the moment a licence comes into force, a provisional licence does not carry reduced obligations. Clubs that apply for a licence without an established consultation structure will need to build one as a condition of maintaining that licence. Clubs should establish their engagement structure before submitting their licensing application.
-
The IFR will assess fan engagement through the club's corporate governance statement, which every licensed club must submit and publish. The statement must explain how the club is applying the IFR's governance code, which includes evidence of the fan engagement process. The IFR will produce an annual governance report assessing how well all regulated clubs are applying the code. In assessing genuineness, the IFR is expected to look beyond the formal existence of a fan body and examine whether that body functions as intended: whether consultations occur, whether fan input is documented, whether it influences decisions, and whether the club communicates back to fans about outcomes.